Ass Hat

Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

End Ass Hat

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by Kalopsia at 2004-11-05 00:43:57

niccolai said:

tbone_r said:

was there proof that Iraq was harboring terrorists?

Was Saddam not a terrorist himself? Did he not order the destruction and inflict terror into select groups? Is Abu Musab al-Zarqawi who, even before we invaded Iraq for the war on terror carried out ritualistic beheadings of US soldiers, a terrorist?

Did Iraq not declare war against the US even before the war on terror and order termination of US soldiers on sight? The US just didn't comply.

Your arguement that Kerry would have more allied support is a good one, chances are he would have gained more support. Although the allies he would have gained, like France, are questionably corrupt like Bush is.

no saddam is/was not a terrorist. he was a dictator. he inflicted fear upon his people, much like what bush is doing to the american people, except saddam is just being a little more extreme. name one country that declares war on another, and then doesn't follow up with an invasion/bombing/ect. (remember, the 9/11 commission concluded that saddam had nothing to do with 9/11, so don't bother trying to use it) and any support would have been better than the little we had.

[default homepage]

5:30:42pm May 11,2024
load time 0.00746 secs/10 queries]