Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by Joe/NotCommon at 2003-05-26 09:12:45

extreme measures are one thing, but suicide bombing?
and for the record i don't get any of my sources from the internet

the palestinian movement has basically failed, their new leader was appointed by the US.

other extreme movements, such as the american revolution or the 1912 uprising in dublin, or the Bolshevik rising, all worked much differently.
the people who were the leaders didn't suicide bomb market areas.
they created situation where they couldn't be ignored, and used methods to raise awarness in other countries.

ophir thinks i don't make sense, so i would like to read his point of view on how suicide bombing can make people sympathetic to their cause?
or if I am wrong about something else, please explain how you figure

the palestinian's have only put them selves into a position to be stomped on by the israeli army.

ariel sharon has already been convicted by the UN for crimes against humanity, but like always they are too puss to do anything about
the Palestinians should realize that this guy won't go into peace talks if they are launching suicide attacks against his civilian population

[default homepage]

[print][

4:59:01am May 24,2024
load time 0.00643 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]