Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls

  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food

  New Thread
  New Poll

E-mail

New site? Maybe some day.

Username:

SPAM Filter: re-type this

(values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)

Message:

UBB enabled. HTML disabled Spam Filtering enabledIcons: (click image to insert) Show All - pop

b i u add: url image video(?)

:	post by ArrowHead nli at 2006-02-16 16:15:15

handinjury said:

REV, How much are you looking to spend?

Whats wrong with prostools? Geesh that and digital performer is only the Industry standard.

First, it's the recording industry standard. Rev runs a radio station.

Secondly, it's an EXPENSIVE standard with a very high learning curve. Rev doesn't need 90% of the higher level features and abilities, and it's HARDWARE EXCLUSIVE, which means instead of being able to buy another 8 channels of audio for $500 he'd have to spend $1600 for a Digi002.

Pro tools is not an idustry standard. It's like mac, they're system exclusive and they were there first. Therefore, people that started with pro tools hae stuck with it.

Pro tools is just software. Quality comes from your pre's, converters, and signal path, NOT from your pro-tools audio engine. There's a lot of amazing stuff I've heard coming out of studios using Nuendo, Cubase, Sonar and Logic. Just check out www.myspace.com/tesseract , all done with Nuendo.

If rev were starting a recording studio, the benefits of running the same system everyone else uses might make pro-tools worth the money. For what he's doing now, there ARE no advantages. (except that everything is bundled with pro-tools, no having to install hardware and software from different

[default homepage]

[print][

7:08:47pm May 28,2024
load time 0.01286 secs/10 queries]

[search]

[refresh page]