Ass Hat
Home
News
Events
Bands
Labels
Venues
Pics
MP3s
Radio Show
Reviews
Releases
Buy$tuff
Forum
  Classifieds
  News
  Localband
  Shows
  Show Pics
  Polls
  
  OT Threads
  Other News
  Movies
  VideoGames
  Videos
  TV
  Sports
  Gear
  /r/
  Food
  
  New Thread
  New Poll
Miscellaneous
Links
E-mail
Search
End Ass Hat
login

New site? Maybe some day.
Posting Anonymously login: [Forgotten Password]
returntothepit >> discuss >> Real Madrid pay $131,528,041.65 transfer fee to buy Cristiano Ronaldo from Manchester United by brian_dc on Jun 11,2009 9:11am
Add To All Your Pages!
toggletoggle post by brian_dc  at Jun 11,2009 9:11am
LONDON - Manchester United accepted a world-record transfer offer for Cristiano Ronaldo from Real Madrid on Thursday, clearing the World Player of the Year to negotiate personal terms with the Spanish club.

The Premier League champions received an unconditional offer of $131 million for Ronaldo, and unlike last offseason is willing to see its 24-year-old star join a major European rival.

United said: "At Cristiano's request — who has again expressed his desire to leave — and after discussion with the player's representatives, United have agreed to give Real Madrid permission to talk to the player.

"Matters are expected to be concluded by 30 June."

Madrid confirmed the offer for Ronaldo in a statement, saying: "The club hopes to reach an agreement with the player in the coming days."

The Portugal winger, who joined United from Sporting Lisbon in 2003, spent last June pushing for what he called at the time a "dream move" to Madrid.

An unsuccessful complaint about Madrid's pursuit was made to soccer's world governing body FIFA and a move was blocked by United manager Alex Ferguson, who traveled to Lisbon to persuade his player to stay at Old Trafford.

That didn't stop Ronaldo being linked with Madrid, and Ferguson's irritation boiled over in December when he said he "wouldn't sell Madrid a virus," describing the club as a "mob."

But now a world-record bid appears too hard to resist for a club whose debts have spiraled to nearly $1 billion.

Ronaldo, who was under contract until 2012, plunged his future into doubt after United lost the Champions League final to Barcelona last month, saying he wasn't sure if would stay. This came despite having vowed to remain with United in the buildup to the match and even in a broadcast interview conducted with himself.

The return of Florentino Perez as Madrid's president has changed things as the billionaire looks to spend lavishly to return the Spanish side to the glory days of its "galactico" era.

Brazilian star Kaka was signed away from AC Milan earlier this week for a reported fee of around $92 million.

But the offer for Ronaldo would eclipse that, as well as the $65 million Madrid paid to lure former France striker Zinedine Zidane away from Juventus in 2001.

Ronaldo's arrival could strengthen Madrid's position as world soccer's richest club based on revenue. According to accountancy firm Deloitte, Madrid earned over $512 million compared to second-place United's $455 million.

On the pitch, though, Ronaldo would be joining a club which just had its first trophyless season in three years, while United won a third straight Premier League title, the Club World Cup, and the League Cup.

Ronaldo finished as United's top scorer again, despite not matching the 42-goal haul in the 2007-8 campaign when Ferguson's side won the Champions League and the English title.

However, Ronaldo was viewed by some as a divisive influence at United, openly challenging Ferguson's authority.

In the last weeks of the season he angrily swiped at some TV equipment while shaking his head in clear annoyance when substituted against Manchester City. When he missed a shot against Wigan, he answered Ferguson back from the pitch while shrugging his shoulders.

Former United manager Tommy Docherty said Thursday that relations were clearly strained with Ferguson, as they had been with David Beckham before he was allowed to join Madrid in 2003.

"You can't have disharmony," said Docherty, who was manager between 1972-77. "With ($151 million), they should cut their hands off with Ronaldo and run and give Real Madrid the problem."

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/more_spo...ord_131m_real_.html#ixzz0I7vJOsPT&D


http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/more_spo...ited_accepts_record_131m_real_.html



toggletoggle post by brian_dc  at Jun 11,2009 9:12am
THAT IS SO MUCH FUCKING MONEY FOR ONE PERSON.



toggletoggle post by xmikex at Jun 11,2009 9:24am


This thread has been hijacked by a real sport.

And the last time I saw Ronaldo play he was like 40 lbs overweight, and Brazil looked like a team of recovering chain smokers in the world cup.



toggletoggle post by brian_dc  at Jun 11,2009 9:26am
Different Ronaldo.




toggletoggle post by brian_dc  at Jun 11,2009 9:32am
Also, America is such a faggot.



toggletoggle post by xmikex at Jun 11,2009 9:34am
fucking Ronaldos



toggletoggle post by HeavensJail_nli at Jun 11,2009 9:41am
This is a good thing, because he's not on the same team with Wayne Rooney any more, so the chance that next year's Champions League will feature C. Ronaldo's balls getting stepped on just skyrocketed.



toggletoggle post by brian_dc  at Jun 11,2009 9:42am
HAHAHA. Yes.

But those two really do get along. It's a disappointment.



toggletoggle post by SkinSandwich at Jun 11,2009 9:45am



toggletoggle post by oscarct  at Jun 11,2009 10:40am
xmikex said[orig][quote]


This thread has been hijacked by a real sport.

And the last time I saw Ronaldo play he was like 40 lbs overweight, and Brazil looked like a team of recovering chain smokers in the world cup.


real sport? by real you mean stopping play every ten seconds?



toggletoggle post by brian_dc  at Jun 11,2009 10:43am
oscarct said[orig][quote]
xmikex said[orig][quote]


This thread has been hijacked by a real sport.

And the last time I saw Ronaldo play he was like 40 lbs overweight, and Brazil looked like a team of recovering chain smokers in the world cup.


real sport? by real you mean stopping play every ten seconds?


this



toggletoggle post by Davemmonic at Jun 11,2009 11:23am
am glad Man-U will let him go cuz Ronldo is a good player but hi is a fucking scumbag anyways even though he gets alone with Rooney he does challenges Ferguson's authority so he needs to go



toggletoggle post by dreadkill  at Jun 11,2009 11:25am
that's nothing compared to the googolplex dollars saint to sinner paid to get rich bova



toggletoggle post by xmikex at Jun 11,2009 12:30pm
By real sport I mean the best conditioned athletes in the world playing one of the most complex team sports ever invented.

Soccer is pretty cute though.



toggletoggle post by AndrewBastard at Jun 11,2009 12:34pm

Ronaldo maybe a faux hawk sporting douche of a person but his is an incredible player; there is no denying that.

As a Man U fan, I'm a little bummed...I don't know if we can continue to own the PL w/out Ronaldo but I guess this'll give Chelsea or Liverpool a chance to finally win the UEFA cup again. ;)




toggletoggle post by oscarct  at Jun 11,2009 12:40pm edited Jun 11,2009 12:42pm
xmikex said[orig][quote]
By real sport I mean the best conditioned athletes in the world playing one of the most complex team sports ever invented.

Soccer is pretty cute though.


soccer players are WAY better athletes then football players..fat does not = conditioned\

your po9st pretty cute though



toggletoggle post by xmikex at Jun 11,2009 12:58pm
Albert Haynesworth 6'6" 320 lbs and runs a 4.8 in the 40. Who's more athletic? The guy playing every down wrestling other 300+ lineman and sprinting for tackles, or the guy jogging for 60 minutes without ever worrying about contact?

Devin Hester is 190 and runs a 4.27. How many soccer players that weigh 40-50 lbs less than him can pull off a sub 4.3?



toggletoggle post by brian_dc  at Jun 11,2009 1:00pm
4



toggletoggle post by oscarct  at Jun 11,2009 1:07pm
xmikex said[orig][quote]
Albert Haynesworth 6'6" 320 lbs and runs a 4.8 in the 40. Who's more athletic? The guy playing every down wrestling other 300+ lineman and sprinting for tackles, or the guy jogging for 60 minutes without ever worrying about contact?

Devin Hester is 190 and runs a 4.27. How many soccer players that weigh 40-50 lbs less than him can pull off a sub 4.3?


when it comes to conditioning I say the guy running for 90 minutes



toggletoggle post by oscarct  at Jun 11,2009 1:07pm
not saying football players arent unbeliveable athletes, just when it comes to conditioning



toggletoggle post by arilliusbm  at Jun 11,2009 1:15pm
oscarct is right - i'd have to argue that futbol players are more conditioned than football players. it's like comparing a long distance runner to a sprinter.
although, I'm sure some NFL positions (WR for example) require the same amount of conditioning.



toggletoggle post by xmikex at Jun 11,2009 2:00pm
I should mention at this point in the conversation that I really enjoy world cup soccer.

Who would I take in the Boston marathon between David Beckham, and Maurice Jones Drew?... David Beckham.

Who would I take in a marathon-like competition that involved sprinting, wrestling, jumping, and skill maneuvers between Ronaldinho and Troy Polamaulu? Polamaulu any day of the week.

Soccer players, and football players work entirely different sets of muscles. One trains for endurance, and the other trains to endure long sets of short but intensely physically demanding bursts. It comes down to what your idea of an athlete is. For my money I'm going with the the freakish athleticism types as found in the NFL.



Enter a Quick Response (advanced response>>)
Username: (enter in a fake name if you want, login, or new user)SPAM Filter: re-type this (values are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,B,C,D,E, or F)
Message:  b i u  add: url  image  video(?)show icons
remember:skynet is always watching protecting you
[default homepage] [print][4:28:23pm Apr 27,2024
load time 0.05171 secs/12 queries]
[search][refresh page]