This seems historically accurate in a de Toqueville or Huntington sense. However, it suggests that the American conservatives are off-base and trying to be liberal, and that's why they always run into logical paradoxes while demanding individual freedom yet higher defense spending, greater infrastructure, supply-side economics, etc.

at this point, the only thing in society that sticks to truly "right wing" and "left wing" is poultry.

i like dark meat.

its all complete bullshit. just a distraction to sidetrack the masses from the real shitstorm that is slowly rotting there lives away.

Maybe these terms just need re-inventing.

After all, the principle is clear: collective (including non-shithead individuals) or individual (which requires you include everyone especially whiny shitheads)?

They refer to positions of a hockey team when they are on the ice.

Joey Juneau is the all time leader in assists by a left-wing in a single season.

It means you're fucking gay.

It's not gay if you punch them out after you come.

If you want an picture of the future imagin a boot stamped on a human face----forever.

Or a human stamping its own face through sheer stupidity.

Red Wings?

I think that's a pretty accurate statement. It definitely applies to what most people refer to as the "Neo-Conservative" Republicans.

a few minutes before i read this, two guys at work were talking and one guy told the other he won an autographed joe juneau hockey stick the other day. weird.

They aren't going to win by out-"freedom"ing the left. The left offers "freedom" (if you don't define your terms, you win) plus a welfare state.

They also haven't convinced any of the more traditional conservatives, so they're stuck with pentacostals and apocalyptics.